DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Multivan vs 2014 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

48.5–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeNissan
MultivanModelCedric
2016Model year2014
MinivanBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

22,2 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
146 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
84 HPPower85 HP
220 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol / LPG
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4892 mmLength4690 mm
1904 mmWidth1695 mm
1970 mmHeight1445 mm
2032 KgWeight1480 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Multivan and 2014 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…