2016 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 Ti-VCT (85 Hp) 2016Overall Score48.25/100
2016 Ford C-Max vs 2016 Volkswagen Multivan Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volkswagen
Multivan
Volkswagen Multivan 2.0 TDI (84 Hp) 2016Overall Score48.5/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Multivan
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
48.25–48.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Multivan
FordMakeVolkswagen
C-MaxModelMultivan
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Multivan
15,9 s0–100 km/h22,2 s
165 km/hTop speed146 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
85 HPPower84 HP
141 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Multivan
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
53 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Multivan
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Multivan
4379 mmLength4892 mm
1828 mmWidth1904 mm
1626 mmHeight1970 mm
1374 KgWeight2032 Kg
—Wheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford C-Max and 2016 Volkswagen Multivan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Multivan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…