DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Nissan Cedric vs 2016 Volkswagen Multivan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

49.25–48.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolkswagen
CedricModelMultivan
2014Model year2016
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h22,2 s
157 km/hTop speed146 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
85 HPPower84 HP
170 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
12 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4892 mm
1695 mmWidth1904 mm
1445 mmHeight1970 mm
1480 KgWeight2032 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Nissan Cedric and 2016 Volkswagen Multivan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…