2016 • Buick
Cascada
Buick Cascada 1.6 Ecotec (200 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
2016 Buick Cascada vs 2016 BMW 3 Serisi Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • BMW
3 Serisi
BMW 3 Serisi EfficientDynamics 2016 320i ED 1.6 170 HPOverall Score75.5/100
WINNER
Buick Cascada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick CascadaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
BuickMakeBMW
CascadaModel3 Serisi
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Buick CascadaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
—0–100 km/h7,6 s
0 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
200 HPPower170 HP
300 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Buick CascadaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Buick CascadaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
—TransmissionAutomatic
245/40 R20Tyre size18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick CascadaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
4696 mmLength4633 mm
1839 mmWidth1811 mm
1447 mmHeight1429 mm
1805 KgWeight1390 kg
—Luggage capacity480 lt
2695 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Buick Cascada and 2016 BMW 3 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…