2016 • BMW
3 Serisi
BMW 3 Serisi EfficientDynamics 2016 320i ED 1.6 170 HPOverall Score75.5/100
2016 BMW 3 Serisi vs 2016 Buick Cascada Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Buick
Cascada
Buick Cascada 1.6 Ecotec (200 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Buick Cascada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationBuick Cascada
BMWMakeBuick
3 SerisiModelCascada
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationBuick Cascada
7,6 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
170 HPPower200 HP
250 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationBuick Cascada
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank54 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,5 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationBuick Cascada
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
AutomaticTransmission—
18Tyre size245/40 R20
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationBuick Cascada
4633 mmLength4696 mm
1811 mmWidth1839 mm
1429 mmHeight1447 mm
1390 kgWeight1805 Kg
480 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2695 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 BMW 3 Serisi and 2016 Buick Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…