DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A1 vs 2016 Buick Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeBuick
A1ModelCascada
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h—
234 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
192 HPPower200 HP
250 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank54 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10,5 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7 S tronicGears6
215/45 R16Tyre size245/40 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3973 mmLength4696 mm
1740 mmWidth1839 mm
1416 mmHeight1447 mm
1180 KgWeight1805 Kg
2469 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A1 and 2016 Buick Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…