DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Buick Cascada vs 2016 Audi A1 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeAudi
CascadaModelA1
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,8 s
0 km/hTop speed234 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
200 HPPower192 HP
300 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank45 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 S tronic
245/40 R20Tyre size215/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength3973 mm
1839 mmWidth1740 mm
1447 mmHeight1416 mm
1805 KgWeight1180 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2469 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Buick Cascada and 2016 Audi A1 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…