DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volkswagen Fox vs 2004 Zastava Yugo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava Yugo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeZastava
FoxModelYugo
2009Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

17,5 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
148 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1116 cc
55 HPPower54 HP
108 NmTorque78 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank32 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14 TTyre size145 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3828 mmLength3490 mm
1660 mmWidth1540 mm
1544 mmHeight1340 mm
998 KgWeight790 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2150 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volkswagen Fox and 2004 Zastava Yugo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…