DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volkswagen Polo vs 2009 Volkswagen Fox Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
PoloModelFox
2004Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors3

Performance

17,5 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
152 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
54 HPPower55 HP
106 NmTorque108 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size165/70 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3897 mmLength3828 mm
1650 mmWidth1660 mm
1465 mmHeight1544 mm
980 KgWeight998 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volkswagen Polo and 2009 Volkswagen Fox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…