DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Zastava Yugo vs 2009 Volkswagen Fox Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava Yugo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZastavaMakeVolkswagen
YugoModelFox
2004Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3Doors3

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
155 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1116 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
54 HPPower55 HP
78 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145 R13Tyre size165/70 R14 T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3490 mmLength3828 mm
1540 mmWidth1660 mm
1340 mmHeight1544 mm
790 KgWeight998 Kg
2150 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Zastava Yugo and 2009 Volkswagen Fox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…