DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volkswagen Eos vs 2012 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
EosModelCaddy
2012Model year2012
Coupe - CabrioletBody typeMinivan
4Seats5/7
2Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
207 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
320 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/55 R16; 235/40 R18Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4423 mmLength4406 mm
1791 mmWidth1794 mm
1444 mmHeight1823 mm
1592 KgWeight1425 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2681 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volkswagen Eos and 2012 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…