DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2012 Volkswagen Eos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
CaddyModelEos
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
5/7Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
186 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
320 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size215/55 R16; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength4423 mm
1794 mmWidth1791 mm
1823 mmHeight1444 mm
1425 KgWeight1592 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volkswagen Caddy and 2012 Volkswagen Eos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…