DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volkswagen Eos vs 2012 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMazda
EosModel6
2012Model year2012
Coupe - CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
207 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower145 HP
320 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/55 R16; 235/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4423 mmLength4865 mm
1791 mmWidth1840 mm
1444 mmHeight1450 mm
1592 KgWeight1300 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volkswagen Eos and 2012 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…