DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2015 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7.25 points.

62.25–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeAudi
CaddyModelA3
2016Model year2015
Minivan, KombiBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
172 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
102 HPPower110 HP
250 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption4,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption4,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears7
—TransmissionS-Tronic
195/65 R15Tyre size16
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4878 mmLength4310 mm
1793 mmWidth1785 mm
1831 mmHeight1425 mm
1587 KgWeight1355 kg
—Luggage capacity380 lt
3006 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Caddy and 2015 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…