DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Kia Niro vs 2016 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolkswagen
NiroModelCaddy
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeMinivan, Kombi
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1591 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
105 HPPower102 HP
147 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption5,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
3,9 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4878 mm
1800 mmWidth1793 mm
1535 mmHeight1831 mm
—Weight1587 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase3006 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Kia Niro and 2016 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…