DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Perodua Alza vs 2016 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeVolkswagen
AlzaModelCaddy
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeMinivan, Kombi
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1495 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
103 HPPower102 HP
136 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption5,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4878 mm
1695 mmWidth1793 mm
1620 mmHeight1831 mm
1125-1140 KgWeight1587 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase3006 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Perodua Alza and 2016 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…