DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2016 Kia Niro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeKia
CaddyModelNiro
2016Model year2016
Minivan, KombiBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1591 cc
102 HPPower105 HP
250 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,8 ltAverage consumption3,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4878 mmLength4355 mm
1793 mmWidth1800 mm
1831 mmHeight1535 mm
1587 KgWeight—
3006 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Caddy and 2016 Kia Niro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…