DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
CaddyModelS40
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
164 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
102 HPPower100 HP
148 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength4476 mm
1794 mmWidth1770 mm
1823 mmHeight1454 mm
1464 KgWeight1311 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volkswagen Caddy and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…