2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6i (100 Hp) 2012Overall Score53.5/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 1.6 (102 Hp) 2012Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Caddy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
VolvoMakeVolkswagen
S40ModelCaddy
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
11,9 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
0 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
100 HPPower102 HP
150 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
PetrolFuel typePetrol / LPG
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4476 mmLength4406 mm
1770 mmWidth1794 mm
1454 mmHeight1823 mm
1311 KgWeight1464 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2681 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…