DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mini Convertible vs 2012 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeVolkswagen
ConvertibleModelCaddy
2012Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
4Seats5/7
2Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
181 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
98 HPPower102 HP
153 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol / LPG
40 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3723 mmLength4406 mm
1683 mmWidth1794 mm
1414 mmHeight1823 mm
1160 KgWeight1464 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2681 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mini Convertible and 2012 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…