DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Toyota Aristo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationToyota Aristo
BMWMakeToyota
Z3ModelAristo
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationToyota Aristo
6,0 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
231 HPPower280 HP
300 NmTorque432 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationToyota Aristo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank75 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationToyota Aristo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/50 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationToyota Aristo
4050 mmLength4865 mm
1740 mmWidth1800 mm
1306 mmHeight1435 mm
1305 KgWeight1680 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Toyota Aristo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…