DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Aristo vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota AristoSpecificationBMW Z3
ToyotaMakeBMW
AristoModelZ3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Toyota AristoSpecificationBMW Z3
—0–100 km/h6,0 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
280 HPPower231 HP
432 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota AristoSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota AristoSpecificationBMW Z3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota AristoSpecificationBMW Z3
4865 mmLength4050 mm
1800 mmWidth1740 mm
1435 mmHeight1306 mm
1680 KgWeight1305 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Aristo and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…