DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Alpina B3 vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.5–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B3SpecificationBMW Z3
AlpinaMakeBMW
B3ModelZ3
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Alpina B3SpecificationBMW Z3
5,9 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
260 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3152 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
265 HPPower231 HP
330 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B3SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B3SpecificationBMW Z3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/40 R17; 265/35 R17Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina B3SpecificationBMW Z3
4433 mmLength4050 mm
1698 mmWidth1740 mm
1373 mmHeight1306 mm
1330 KgWeight1305 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Alpina B3 and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…