2000 • BMW
Z3
BMW Z3 3.0i (231 Hp) 2000Overall Score79.5/100
2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Mitsubishi GTO Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
GTO
Mitsubishi GTO 3.0 i V6 24V 4WD Turbo (280 Hp) 2000Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
BMW Z3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW Z3SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
BMWMakeMitsubishi
Z3ModelGTO
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
BMW Z3SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
6,0 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
231 HPPower280 HP
300 NmTorque417 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
BMW Z3SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank75 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW Z3SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW Z3SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
4050 mmLength4575 mm
1740 mmWidth1840 mm
1306 mmHeight1285 mm
1305 KgWeight1710 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2470 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Mitsubishi GTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…