DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 1999 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.5–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationAlpina B3
BMWMakeAlpina
Z3ModelB3
2000Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationAlpina B3
6,0 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
250 km/hTop speed260 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement3152 cc
231 HPPower265 HP
300 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank62 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationAlpina B3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size235/40 R17; 265/35 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationAlpina B3
4050 mmLength4433 mm
1740 mmWidth1698 mm
1306 mmHeight1373 mm
1305 KgWeight1330 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 1999 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…