DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 1996 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.5–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationAlpina B3
BMWMakeAlpina
Z3ModelB3
2000Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationAlpina B3
6,0 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
250 km/hTop speed254 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
231 HPPower250 HP
300 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank65 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationAlpina B3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size235/40 R17; 265/35 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationAlpina B3
4050 mmLength4433 mm
1740 mmWidth1710 mm
1306 mmHeight1328 mm
1305 KgWeight1450 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 1996 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…