DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 3 vs 2012 Toyota RAV4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationToyota RAV4
MazdaMakeToyota
3ModelRAV4
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationToyota RAV4
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
206 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1987 cc
150 HPPower151 HP
191 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationToyota RAV4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationToyota RAV4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationToyota RAV4
4460 mmLength4570 mm
1755 mmWidth1845 mm
1470 mmHeight1660 mm
1280 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 Toyota RAV4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…