DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota RAV4 vs 2011 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota RAV4SpecificationMazda 3
ToyotaMakeMazda
RAV4Model3
2012Model year2011
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Toyota RAV4SpecificationMazda 3
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
185 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1987 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
151 HPPower151 HP
195 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota RAV4SpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota RAV4SpecificationMazda 3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota RAV4SpecificationMazda 3
4570 mmLength4460 mm
1845 mmWidth1755 mm
1660 mmHeight1470 mm
—Weight1270 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota RAV4 and 2011 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…