DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota RAV4 vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeJeep
RAV4ModelCompass
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1987 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
151 HPPower136 HP
195 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption7,40 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,40 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4570 mmLength4448 mm
1845 mmWidth1812 mm
1660 mmHeight1718 mm
—Weight1634 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota RAV4 and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…