2000 • Toyota
Picnic
Toyota Picnic 2.2 D (CMX10) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
2000 Toyota Picnic vs 2000 Opel Campo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 2.3 (98 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Picnic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota PicnicSpecificationOpel Campo
ToyotaMakeOpel
PicnicModelCampo
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typePick-up
6Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota PicnicSpecificationOpel Campo
13,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
205 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota PicnicSpecificationOpel Campo
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota PicnicSpecificationOpel Campo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Toyota PicnicSpecificationOpel Campo
4530 mmLength4980 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1620 mmHeight1710 mm
1420 KgWeight—
2735 mmWheelbase3025 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Picnic and 2000 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Picnic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…