DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Maxima vs 2000 Toyota Picnic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Picnic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeToyota
MaximaModelPicnic
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats6
4Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h13,9 s
201 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1974 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
177 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4530 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1420 mmHeight1620 mm
1310 KgWeight1420 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Maxima and 2000 Toyota Picnic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Picnic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…