2000 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 2.3 (98 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Opel Campo vs 2000 Toyota Picnic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Picnic
Toyota Picnic 2.2 D (CMX10) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Picnic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CampoSpecificationToyota Picnic
OpelMakeToyota
CampoModelPicnic
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
5Seats6
4Doors5
Performance
Opel CampoSpecificationToyota Picnic
—0–100 km/h13,9 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
98 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CampoSpecificationToyota Picnic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel CampoSpecificationToyota Picnic
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel CampoSpecificationToyota Picnic
4980 mmLength4530 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1710 mmHeight1620 mm
—Weight1420 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Campo and 2000 Toyota Picnic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Picnic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…