DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Picnic vs 2000 Nissan Maxima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Picnic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeNissan
PicnicModelMaxima
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
6Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,9 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
165 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
205 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4770 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1620 mmHeight1420 mm
1420 KgWeight1310 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Picnic and 2000 Nissan Maxima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Picnic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…