2000 • Toyota
Picnic
Toyota Picnic 2.2 D (CMX10) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
2000 Toyota Picnic vs 2000 Mahindra Commander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mahindra
Commander
Mahindra Commander 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Picnic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota PicnicSpecificationMahindra Commander
ToyotaMakeMahindra
PicnicModelCommander
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats8
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota PicnicSpecificationMahindra Commander
13,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed90 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2523 cc
90 HPPower50 HP
205 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota PicnicSpecificationMahindra Commander
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota PicnicSpecificationMahindra Commander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
195/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota PicnicSpecificationMahindra Commander
4530 mmLength4305 mm
1695 mmWidth1680 mm
1620 mmHeight1740 mm
1420 KgWeight1450 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2680 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Picnic and 2000 Mahindra Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Picnic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…