DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Harrier vs 2000 Volvo S70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
HarrierModelS70
2000Model year2000
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
170 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2364 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
160 HPPower144 HP
221 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
13 ltUrban consumption14,2 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/70 R16 99STyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4720 mm
1815 mmWidth1760 mm
1665 mmHeight1400 mm
1590 KgWeight1430 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Harrier and 2000 Volvo S70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…