DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2000 Toyota Harrier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
L 200ModelHarrier
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSUV, Crossover
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
142 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2364 cc
132 HPPower160 HP
192 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/80 R16Tyre size215/70 R16 99S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4575 mm
1655 mmWidth1815 mm
1570 mmHeight1665 mm
1660 KgWeight1590 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2000 Toyota Harrier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…