DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Largo vs 2000 Toyota Harrier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeToyota
LargoModelHarrier
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSUV, Crossover
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2388 ccEngine displacement2364 cc
145 HPPower160 HP
192 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,67 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/70 R14Tyre size215/70 R16 99S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4575 mm
1745 mmWidth1815 mm
1905 mmHeight1665 mm
1620 KgWeight1590 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Largo and 2000 Toyota Harrier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…