2000 • Toyota
Harrier
Toyota Harrier 2.4 16V (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score60.25/100
2000 Toyota Harrier vs 2000 Nissan Largo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Largo
Nissan Largo 2.4 i 16V (145 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Harrier
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota HarrierSpecificationNissan Largo
ToyotaMakeNissan
HarrierModelLargo
2000Model year2000
SUV, CrossoverBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota HarrierSpecificationNissan Largo
12,0 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2364 ccEngine displacement2388 cc
160 HPPower145 HP
221 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota HarrierSpecificationNissan Largo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,67 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota HarrierSpecificationNissan Largo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/70 R16 99STyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota HarrierSpecificationNissan Largo
4575 mmLength4610 mm
1815 mmWidth1745 mm
1665 mmHeight1905 mm
1590 KgWeight1620 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Harrier and 2000 Nissan Largo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…