DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Toyota Harrier vs 2013 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeGreat Wall
HarrierModelCowry
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1986 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
151 HPPower143 HP
193 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
Super CVT-iGears5
225/65 R17; 235/55 R18Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4574 mm
1835 mmWidth1704 mm
1690 mmHeight1845 mm
1560-1630 KgWeight1510 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Toyota Harrier and 2013 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…