DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 BMW 3 Serisi vs 2013 Toyota Harrier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeToyota
3 SerisiModelHarrier
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1986 cc
143 HPPower151 HP
190 NmTorque193 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6GearsSuper CVT-i
205/55 R16 HTyre size225/65 R17; 235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4612 mmLength4720 mm
1782 mmWidth1835 mm
1384 mmHeight1690 mm
1595 KgWeight1560-1630 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 BMW 3 Serisi and 2013 Toyota Harrier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…