DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Great Wall Cowry vs 2013 Toyota Harrier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeToyota
CowryModelHarrier
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeSUV
8Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1986 cc
143 HPPower151 HP
185 NmTorque193 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5GearsSuper CVT-i
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size225/65 R17; 235/55 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4720 mm
1704 mmWidth1835 mm
1845 mmHeight1690 mm
1510 KgWeight1560-1630 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Great Wall Cowry and 2013 Toyota Harrier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…