DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Toyota Funcargo vs 2002 Hyundai Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Funcargo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeHyundai
FuncargoModelMatrix
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
175 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
106 HPPower82 HP
145 NmTorque187 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3860 mmLength4025 mm
1660 mmWidth1740 mm
1680 mmHeight1635 mm
1075 KgWeight1370 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Toyota Funcargo and 2002 Hyundai Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…