DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chevrolet Corsa vs 2002 Toyota Funcargo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Funcargo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeToyota
CorsaModelFuncargo
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
177 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
92 HPPower106 HP
127 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3730 mmLength3860 mm
1610 mmWidth1660 mm
1390 mmHeight1680 mm
975 KgWeight1075 Kg
2445 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chevrolet Corsa and 2002 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…