2002 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.5 dCi (82 Hp) 2002Overall Score50.25/100
2002 Renault Clio vs 2002 Toyota Funcargo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Toyota
Funcargo
Toyota Funcargo 1.5 i 16V (106 Hp) 2002Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Funcargo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationToyota Funcargo
RenaultMakeToyota
ClioModelFuncargo
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationToyota Funcargo
12,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
175 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
82 HPPower106 HP
185 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationToyota Funcargo
DieselFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationToyota Funcargo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationToyota Funcargo
3773 mmLength3860 mm
1639 mmWidth1660 mm
1417 mmHeight1680 mm
1035 KgWeight1075 Kg
2471 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Renault Clio and 2002 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…