DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Toyota Funcargo vs 2000 Toyota Yaris Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Yaris

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
FuncargoModelYaris
1999Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
165 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
86 HPPower86 HP
124 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3890 mmLength3615 mm
1690 mmWidth1660 mm
1680 mmHeight1500 mm
1055 KgWeight975 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2370 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Toyota Funcargo and 2000 Toyota Yaris approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Yaris leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…