DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 1999 Toyota Funcargo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Star

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
Space StarModelFuncargo
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,2 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
170 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
86 HPPower86 HP
120 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength3890 mm
1715 mmWidth1690 mm
1515 mmHeight1680 mm
1170 KgWeight1055 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Space Star and 1999 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Star leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…