DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Funcargo vs 1999 Toyota Funcargo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Funcargo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
FuncargoModelFuncargo
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
165 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
86 HPPower86 HP
124 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3890 mmLength3890 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1680 mmHeight1680 mm
1055 KgWeight1055 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Funcargo and 1999 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…