DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Cresta vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeCitroen
CrestaModelXM
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
97 HPPower129 HP
221 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4708 mm
1755 mmWidth1794 mm
1420 mmHeight1394 mm
—Weight1564 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Cresta and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…