DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Toyota Cresta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.5–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeToyota
XMModelCresta
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h—
201 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
129 HPPower97 HP
285 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4750 mm
1794 mmWidth1755 mm
1394 mmHeight1420 mm
1564 KgWeight—
2850 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…