DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Toyota Cresta vs 2000 Toyota Cresta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Cresta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.5–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
CrestaModelCresta
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
97 HPPower97 HP
221 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4750 mm
1755 mmWidth1755 mm
1420 mmHeight1420 mm
2730 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Toyota Cresta and 2000 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Cresta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…